| View previous topic | View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
|
|
... |
|
 Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:46 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Cactus, I've replied to those already y'eejit. They're just YouTube videos and we've been down that road many times matey.
I do not accept YouTube videos as evidence.
Period.
DB |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They're not just youtube videos - they're cases. If you went outside tonight and you happened to have your camera, then a UFO flew right up beside you and you recorded it all - what would you do with the footage?
The most convient way to 'get it out there' is sites like youtube. If you post it to the news it won't be shown!? |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| But yes I too agree the videos themselves are not evidence. The only time such videos would be evidence for me, would be if I was holding the camera, or possibly someone I fully trusted. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thecactus wrote: | They're not just youtube videos - they're cases. If you went outside tonight and you happened to have your camera, then a UFO flew right up beside you and you recorded it all - what would you do with the footage?
The most convient way to 'get it out there' is sites like youtube. If you post it to the news it won't be shown!? |
I'd seriously question what I'd filmed. Try to find a logical explanation and (if by some miracle) none was forthcoming I'd submit it for analysis to some reputable research organisation - NOT POST IT ON FRIKKING YOUTUBE.
DB |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd seriously question what I'd filmed. Try to find a logical explanation and (if by some miracle) none was forthcoming I'd submit it for analysis to some reputable research organisation
Yes but I was talking there about really close up encounters (Turkey UFO with greys) (and what agentscott described) If you were holding the camera for either of those surely you would become a believer!? |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thecactus wrote: | I'd seriously question what I'd filmed. Try to find a logical explanation and (if by some miracle) none was forthcoming I'd submit it for analysis to some reputable research organisation
Yes but I was talking there about really close up encounters (Turkey UFO with greys) (and what agentscott described) If you were holding the camera for either of those surely you would become a believer!? |
NO - because we don't know the facts Cactus - we weren't there were we?. It could be total bull sh*t for all you know.
DB |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 1042
Location: Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting debunk technique here DB, striking out at the realness of it all....What happened to being just skeptik?
I can tell here that you neither understand why any of that doesn't matter when you see something close, the textbooks go down and the feeling of..who cares about filming goes up(although if you can't you will be dissapointed afterwards, personally i'd like to see my own sightings again) I was thinking....I can see for myself.
Perhaps youtube's not quite the best pace to go out to prove it all.
Photobuket is much better coz thats not got the 'reputaion'. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why is photobucket better?. Any online forum that hosts pictures is as questionable in terms of those pictures validity as YouTube.
Would you like me to spell it out in very simple terms why pictures and videos of UFOs are not acceptable as valid evidence?.
DB |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D B Sweeney,
| Quote: |
Would you like me to spell it out in very simple terms why pictures and videos of UFOs are not acceptable as valid evidence?.
|
I agree, unless I was holding the camera (for something similar to the Turkey UFO which showed greys inside) |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 1042
Location: Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No thankyou.
My sightings were all I needed so I don't need vids to prove anything.
But when I see simularities then I know they are likley real. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 1042
Location: Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No vid on any site is proff no matter how good?
These debunkers have really done a good job. The word photographic evidence is null and void.
Never mind firsthand experience is much better. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No vid on any site is proff no matter how good?
Have you seen Independence Day?. That was shot over 10 years ago. A skilled artist can replicate that level of realism on a home computer now - ever seen the Mexico city UFO footage?.
Jesus H. Agentscott you've got a lot to learn.
DB |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am in between you two - I don't consider footage solid proof either; but I don't totally dismiss 'all' of it either. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 1042
Location: Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't mean they do and hey not everyone can use a computer for the web let alone be a faker with CGI skills and plenty of time.
My god no wonder the fav line is..."there is no evidence" they won't accept anything thats why. It's there just denyed. |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Worldofghosts 24 hour chat room
