View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
damaralenoire
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 334 Location: South Wales UK
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: OK, Scientific Explanatio needed |
|
|
Ok, As some of you may be aware, I am quite a keen photographer.
But yet, some things turn out on photos which I can not explain. OK
Digital Camera the following picture was taken with.
It was at a Halloween Party a couple of years ago at uni. this picture has always baffled me and mates because I was taking a picture of my two uni mates Julian And Lee, I only took two pictures which will shortly follow
The first one was perfectly fine, but the second, Julian was transparent, so much so, you could seet the chairs behind him. How is this possible????
If you look at the first pic, you can just see that there are chairs behind him through the gaps, but the second picture you can actually see the chairs in full though Julians body
And remember only two pics were taken in that area, that day and at that time. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
YB Moderator
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 2167 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My first thoughts are camera malfunction or motion blur or a combo of both. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
flossy Moderator
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 4921 Location: UK tyne/wear (geordie land)
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oo now that is just plain spooky lol |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
mrx3010
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 579
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Based on the color of image 1 (normal) and 2 it is clear there was something different about #2. #2 seems to be taken without flash, if Julian moved before the pic was snapped it is possible that this would be the end result. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Solstice Moon
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 272 Location: Horsham, W Sussex
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrx3010 wrote: | Based on the color of image 1 (normal) and 2 it is clear there was something different about #2. #2 seems to be taken without flash, if Julian moved before the pic was snapped it is possible that this would be the end result. |
Also, if you look at Lee's left hand, there seems to be motion blur there. Would be quite a long exposure for this effect though, wouldnt it? |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
damaralenoire
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 334 Location: South Wales UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They were quick snaps. The first one I thought was to bright so I turned the flash off and then took the other one, they were still both stood there and as far as I am aware they did move an awful lot, not enough to dissapear out of the picture completely |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
mrx3010
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 579
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is definitely camera movement between both shots, look at the door and the light stand behind the men. You can see the camera and the individuals both have moved a bit. I think it's a great photo but I don't see anything "I" can label as paranormal in it. I could analyze it a bit more for you, but I would need a copy of the original photo file to do that. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Cliffraves
Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 192 Location: Middlesbrough uk
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They is camera movement
also could been refection of balloon somet like that to make second image fade. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
|